The increase in opening the doors of power to the minorities, and the opportunity for citizens to intervene more broadly in their government, two issues are essential by one notch, but this is not enough.Thus, the third vital principle, in tomorrow's policy tends to break the lock on the resolution, and move it to where he should be transferred - and this - and not only change leaders - is the opposite of the political form. There is a drug we call: split decision. "
There are problems can not be settled at the local level. There are other problems can not be settled, at the national level. And some require work in parallel and Mtwagueta at different levels.Otherwise, the appropriate place to resolve the problem. Is not constant but varies with time.
If we want to finish the era besieged decisions, which is the result of fatigue institutions operate, it is important then that decision Ndzi. And re-distributed - and divided broadly, and determine where you take the decision, according to the quality problems. To move the current political system actually paradoxical contradiction with this principle: as the problems have changed, but the decision-making authority has not changed. Thus, for example, that many of the decisions are still subject to the centralized, while that institutions Ondjt architecture optimized ripening, at the national level. In contrast, there is no enough decisions at the local level, and all existing structures in this field, still lag dramatically. All of this is to point out that we have very little of decisions, abandoned at the national level underneath any regions and countries, and the provinces and local communities, or social gatherings, free of geographical economy.
We, at the global level, primitive, backward and still in this subject as we were 300 years ago. While he found out a number of decisions, moves to the highest degree, out of state, we will be able to intervene, a greater degree of success, at this level, which is the cradle of choice (or exposure) to the problems that threatened to burst, and the candidate to confront us we are. And by virtue of that, Resolution Center will find it overburdened, I mean that the state - the nation, would ease the burden somewhat. The division (sharing) resolution, something basic. Whatever the case is, we will not be have come only half way, and self-evident that it is important to "go down" a large part of the decision-making centers, or to climb down its level. However, we find here the principle that: "either total or nothing", does not work or is not correct. The issue is not in opposition to the central decentralization, in the absolute sense, for the problem at hand is to reframe the resolution mechanism within the system swelled the central inflation considerably, even to find ways to notifications stifles decision-making centers.
Of course, delete or mitigate central, not to ensure the existence of democracy. So that the possibility of the emergence of some small Alastbdadat and senseless compassion, not deleted., Often local politics more corrupt than the national policy. This is to say: that which he Johmk "decentralization" is not really only a kind of counterfeiting of this decentralization, and the beneficiaries, they would be from the central enthusiasts.
However, a person can be discussed as much as he wants, but he can not be re common sense and order and success in management) - and this is true for many countries - but the transfer of significant central authority. And Juba must never defragment the burden of decision, and make it to a large extent in the hands of the lower authorities.
Not claiming that some anarchists Romantiqian, they want to go back to the democratic village or that some large taxpayer taxes and resentful of this demanding cuts large allocations established for social assistance (special Palmaosen), but for some reason is much simpler than this: Vabannah political even equipped a range of computers , can not absorb only a certain part of the decision, of a certain quality, but governments - by virtue of the large number of duties resolution - passed the point of no return.
Another thing also is that government institutions must-have that is consistent with the structure of the economy, and information system, and other considerations arising from civilization time in which it operates. We are currently experiencing a scattering of central and local fragmentation of production and economic activity. The fact that it is quite possible not to be the national economy and unity is the norm.
As we noted earlier, we are seeing within national economies, the emergence of the economies of partial areas, increasingly important. Then see for Atbzl companies effort to do segmenting internal only, but also partition the centrality depending on the existing areas.
This all arises, in part, for the huge shift in Ciel information that irrigate the community. With weak central bifurcation seeing, what we noticed before - the disintegration of the central core of the contacts, we are seeing a proliferation terrible in the number of cable televisions, computers and electronic communication systems, all of which goes in the direction of decentralization. It is not possible that the company, Panther economic activity, and communications, and a lot of basic working methods, without seeing the same, one day, forcing the decision also scattering (ie, scattering the decision between branches of the company).
All this requires something other than just raise the political institutions, as required by fierce battles, its goal is control over budgets and taxes, land, energy, and other sources. The scattering or scattering centers resolution will not be an easy grab requirement, but something must, or inevitable in the country saturated very centralized.
التسميات
third wave