When Ronald Reagan still occupies the White House, he met a small group once around the dining room table family "to talk about the distant future of the United States. Was among those eight future scientists (mean specialists affairs future). They were joined by Vice President and three senior advisors to the President, whom Donald Regan, who had been appointed a short time ago, as head of staff of the White Palace.
The meeting was organized by (or by) the authors of these lines, at the request of the White House: The meeting opened on a common note is that if future scientists differ greatly on a number of technical problems, And social, political, they were all Matlvin in thinking that the U.S. economy is about to suffer a profound change.
And This opinion is expressed, even kick Ronald Reagan, to say violently: "So - and said this amusingly - Do you think we would live and each cut of some other hair, or we will live and cut hamburgers for the eaters?! And we will never be industrialized country?!
The president and vice president looked to all sides waiting for an answer. But male guests were look like amazed, most of whom, which appeared in this surprise attack and violence. And Heidi Toffler are responding to this challenge, and said: No, Mr. Reagan, citing patient. Then she said. The United States will remain a superpower. The difference is that people who work in the labs, they will be - slightly less than the number now..".
Then that after she explained Maevsal traditional working methods from those suitable for the production of Almasantosh MACINTOSH Reported that the United States was, without any doubt, one of the major sources of food products in the world, despite the fact that agriculture occupies what is less than 2% of the working people. In fact, in the last century, the smaller the number of workers in agriculture, these reinforce their positions, not retreat. Why not be the case in the industrial sector?!
In fact, surprisingly, is that the volume of industrial use in the United States, after flights and the common, was in 1988 like in 1968 almost, slightly more than 19 million people. Was - industry in 1988 to contribute to the national income, as they did before Thirty years: but they were doing so, a lower portion, of the working people.
On the other hand, what happened after that nothing written, easy to explain. The American people, on the one hand, and his oath worker on the other hand, was for them to watched grow each follow-up, on the other hand, the great team of industrialists reorganized their industries and Otmtwa ways their production in the eighties, and it was natural that the landing percentage of workers in the industry, for to other sectors.
According to some estimates, the country had to establish in the past ten subsequent at least ten thousand jobs, per day, but the section quite a bit of this, go to the industrial sector - and perhaps there will not be any opportunity should not be there any chance . There has been such a development in the economies of Japan and Europe, (West course).
However, we hear sometimes, a semblance of words Ronald Reagan from the mouth of people industrialists, when their institutions not managed well, or from the mouth of some trade unionists who see the numbers of their workers decreases strongly, or on the lips of some economists or historians who sounding drums to calculate the greatness industrial - just As if someone said one day that he wants to reduce the industry.
There behind more Maigal and writes, a feeling of some kind, that use the manual work, mainly, as transmitted primarily, to the services sector and professions intellectual, to be one way or another, and that harm the economy as a whole, and that the industrial sector is a diminutive (in terms of jobs or employment opportunities) to "unload" the country from its article or substance. This Maivkr perceptions French Alvezaoukratian in the eighteenth century, who can not imagine the industrial sector of the economy and its future without agriculture because it is the only product activity.
التسميات
third wave