Blabbing and responsibility of medical literature.. the information disclosed to the doctor in the context of the professional relationship between him and the patient is considered confidential to the greatest extent possible

The nature of the relationship between doctor and patient that allows first see the ins and the secrets of his patient that does not reveal her last unless forced, and whether the password relate to the same disease or the specificities of the other seen by a doctor by profession, this password Secretariat is not permissible for him to disclose them without permission or necessity, it was narrated that the Prophet peace be upon him, said: "If modern man then turned it secretariat" [1], and has stipulated regulations medical ethics of the Association of American Medical reads as follows: "the information disclosed to the doctor in the context of the professional relationship between him and the patient is considered confidential as far as possible "[2] and also provides that:" I do not permissible for a doctor to disclose confidential information without the patient's permission unless it is demanding that the rule of law "[3], here we find are fully compatible between the perception of legitimacy and the perception of contemporary knew the profession toward professional secrecy, even these exceptions contained in the regulations referred to arguing religiously, 

On the other hand the patient's permission Fbla forms, and while on the rule of law, the rule of Sharia: "potentially damage your to pay damage in" [4], Vafshae the mystery of the patient's particular damage, but it is likely if concerned by the public interest, the largest such as being infected with disease epidemic seriously , and then the doctor does not have to disclose the secret Maakhma but blaming Badmh, but here shall be a disclosure to the extent necessary to achieve the interest does not exceed it, because what is permissible to need as much exaggerated. The point is that if the doctor prattle without justification and consequent damage to the patient - even if the moral damage - and proved that it was positive for medical liability. 

  [1] Sunan al-Tirmidhi - interview (1959) and Al-Tirmidhi said: This is a good talk 

[2] Code of Medical Ethics, American Medical Association, E-5.05 Confidentiality 

[3] Previous 

[4] Journal of the judicial provisions - Article 26