Imagine the attack in the context of medical practice from two sides, one felony willful aggression and this rare but is located, and the second from the point of medication without the permission of the patient or guardian or who has the mandate of public or private, and the following is a breakdown:
1 - Assault intentionally: This is also mentioned rare, but it is located either motivated felony manslaughter and either motivated justifications mentality perverted, as occurred in some country that some medical personnel to kill some patients with the dilemma of claiming Araanhm of the disease and the like, in which case if it is proven intent, assault Al comes to the crime of willful aggression and deal with the elimination of this perspective.
2 - medication without permission: This is more common in the context of the profession, and the image of the matter that the doctor diagnostic or therapeutic action without taking the patient's permission,
If the result of this act and the injury proved to be a doctor was not authorized to act within only in exceptional cases, and these exceptional cases are emergencies that do not allow them time Bastiman patient is most likely the loss of the patient or damage to the member from the delay in medication, and the fact that the suit lack of permission here where the view because the doctor has the habit permission in from the competent authorities to provide treatment ambulatory in these cases, but may be it so, and it remains to be seen in cases not ambulatory and here swinging and should take permission of the patient or guardian before proceeding in any medical act , but it should be noted that issues permission to medical where detail so that you can not judge them by one, and that we decide in this position is that originally required to take permission and approval before taking medication, and that originally required to ensure the damage caused by the medication without permission, and it remains to consider cases outweigh the private interest or public not to consider this permission.
This we have a clearer obligations of medical responsibility, and I like to mention here the division very beautiful son of Imam Jawziyyah said the sections of the doctors point of damaging selves or members, where doctors department God's mercy into five sections are:
1 - doctor gave dexterous workmanship and did not avoid the right hand, bred from authorized to do it from the point of view of the street and Adoba [1] User damage or psychology or go recipe, it does not guarantee him a deal. I said, and enters this in everything that happens from complications of the disease or diagnostic or therapeutic procedure if a doctor committed to professionalism and taking what counts medical authorization, in this case does not guarantee anything, nor be responsible for the damage, even if one misses the soul.
2 - Mttabb ignorant embarked on his hand from Adoba Vtlv it, this is the flag of the victim that he is ignorant and authorized him there is no guarantee (I said, because the patient is negligent where allowed ignorant Pttabiba, does not prevent this from Tazir this ignorant for daring to what is not permissible for him), but thought that a doctor and patient authorized to bewitched him in order to know what the doctor within reaped his hand. I said: This is due to the positive second that we mentioned a positive ignorance.
3 - doctor authorized dexterous workmanship and gave him the right, but missed his hand, and crossed to the true Votfah member, such that the run-up to the hand of Alkhatn beam [2] This ensures that it is a felony for an error. I said: This is due to the positive third that we mentioned a positive error, and shall ensure that the crime here may be a doctor (with no third) or rational or house money on the detail of the jurists.
4 - subtle skilled doctor Besnaath painstakingly described the patient's medication overshot, killing him, he recalled that the son Jawziyyah parental house on either money or sane doctor, and it ensures that this concept because it devolves into a positive error.
5 - doctor deftly gave workmanship right to cut off a commodity [3] of a man or a boy or a crazy without his permission or the permission guardian, or a circumcised boy without the permission of his guardian Vtlv, said our companions [4]: ensures that it generates from doing unauthorized, and then mention the controversy as noted in the included it in the positive fourth mean positive attack [5].
These divisions mentioned in the very Hassan, and fall below most sections of the obligations of responsibility that liberated above.
[1] any of the treats a patient who is authorized to treatment
[2] beam: tip of the penis
[3] Item inflation in the member of the body
[4] The Hanbali wants God's mercy God's mercy on them
[5] Zaad - Ibn Jawziyyah - Adapted 4/128-130
التسميات
Medical liability