Thread: Some educators believe that the book should be kept away from the process of education, arguing that the books to Atalmana only speak with the brightest future. While others feel that the book is the first and basic way to get knowledge.
Introduction: Undeniably a book of great value in providing the reader with various forms of knowledge and colors, but what has been played since the invention of writing so far from a fundamental role in the storage and preservation of all human heritage knowledge that has accumulated much through the ages.However, if the value of these books for the preservation of heritage of humanity, there are those whoobject to this value in the educational field any communication of knowledge, as it considers useless knowledge, and an obstacle in obtaining the correct knowledge, especially in the early stages of education.
The issue is that we are dealing with is exposed to two positions from the textbook, there are those who support it, and makes it the key to the acquisition of knowledge, and the starting point in the educational process, and there Enbzh and considered useless and an impediment in obtaining the knowledge, especially in the early stages of education because it did not know but words.
And we will try to analyze the topic by discussing the following points:
1 - What is the position of the rejectionists of the textbook?
2 - What is the position of his supporters?
3 - What is the direction you should take about two views?
Analysis:
1 - leads the naysayers textbook breeder Jean-Jacques Rousseau and pioneers methods refresher. The Russo touches in his attitude to some extent prevent student access to any book before reaching the fifteenth, because it prefers knowledge coming from the same things any nature. He hates books: they learn one is talking about what did not know. Also say: There is no book sings about personal experience and direct interaction with reality.
In Rousseau's view that the senses are the key to knowledge. So you must be senses guide thought and Dalila in the first operation: (The early teachers in life are our legs and our hands and our eyes. And bring the book store all these, he is to Ayalmana inference but teaches us to use the minds of others, and teaches us to believe a lot and do not know anything ills all). And the use of books instead of legs, hands and eyes to Ayalmana independent thinking for ourselves. But teaches thinking changed the minds of authors and writers. The ideas formed by man himself from things clearer and more convincing than those acquired by which learn from others, and books. On the other hand sees Rousseau that books are an example of a social environment, they are enough to spoil the jam every educated, especially if read the child, and what he has Queen governance, and what coming from knowledge that allows him to estimate what the of true and false, Vtjolh in the hands of others, and pay to the tradition, and boil to keep up with the social milieu of reflection and assessment as written by other depending on the third party rather than ability and fuller than done.
(The books teach children to take a lot of others on the Siebel confidence but Analmanm know something themselves) and if the child went to this area, the subjectivity and effort spent lost in the composition and upbringing.
The studies recommended by Rousseau student is limited to the natural sciences, led by astronomy and geography Not taught by Alkhartat, but by travel and see things for themselves.
The study of geography is based on two main points: the city in which the child lives, and grandfather's house in the village and then the distance between them in addition to the rivers and the appearance of the sun and how to sunrise.
And when he wants to teach his student physics stems from the nature. And gives us an example. Take him a stone in his hand, then let him down and asks his student, Emil, about the reason for his downfall. And when you do not answer intervene is to explain to him that any fall see their weight. Since nature is the primary source of knowledge, the Russo believes that the primary means major acquisition is the senses, Senses are doors of knowledge, mind and thoughts, then Flanhol Ahsasatna to ideas, but should not jump leap and one of the things perceived to things mental reasonable by things sensible, So Vruzo reduces the value of books as a source of knowledge, and that elevates the value of experience or personal experience and self-Child initiative. In the first phase of his life must be negative upbringing Educational, sees things himself and interact with it. Using his thinking in order to obtain true knowledge.The knowledge obtained from books I, they learn only speech did not know.
2 - and stand in the second party Many educators, gave the book right to the lead in the acquisition of encyclopedic knowledge, and remind them Rablai MONTAGNE Montaigne And Aarasm Erasme Then Alan Alain In the twentieth century. We will stand when Alan came his views mostly Kttiar counter to the principles of what has been termed the modern education. So it looks strange. Although by a deep philosophical way, is influenced by his exposure to the writings of Plato and Descartes, Hegel and Kant, which builds these views on the basic idea, that childhood case of sophisticated eager full of masculinity.The mission of Education not to lock the boy in the crucible of his childhood, but on the contrary, it can help to get rid of them for assistant rushes to acquire the true qualities of manhood. This is contrary to what Rousseau came in respect of childhood and attention Bhadhar child only. Thus, the position of each of the book was consistent with each look to the child and to the purpose of education.
The Russo which gives utmost importance to the present child and attention Btafolth, sees necessary keep everything interfere in normal growth proper, including the book for Aasudh only knowledge of Aiarafha because it did not use the tendency toward manhood, and finds that the reasons for reaching this goal is to rely on book , and a lot of reading and get the child to Mastery and to acquire a great deal of information.
Alan did not consider a satisfied look of views, which calls for education children Palmhawkat and games that he sees the means for fun and not for breeding. Based on this, considered the key to the culture of reading and the starting point in education. And make much of an exaggeration other materials even scientific ones, and means it, he felt that writing and arithmetic can be gained quickly, but to read this is difficult, and means that reading comfortable without effort, in a way GOES her self for characters interesting sense, and in this regard says : (if you leader of the speakers witty person to have made all the lessons lessons read. reads history, geography, science and ethics, and if no saves of all these readings only art reading only, ruled that this is enough. and expelled from schools all kinds of eloquence, which so makes reading very all Lessons: (if you are a manager of education, to have made it my duty first reading instruction for all citizens, and this has given Alan reading right fore and considered the key to understanding the production of human thought. they are in view reach the child to reach manhood integrated, and so industrious and experience, exercise and patience ...
If we look at the views of Alan imagine that the education program at the school is a quota for the infinite lesson from reading. (Read and re-read, every turn and voice modulators, and the rest are following a low voice, and the teacher watching, and it has to work a lot in this area), but is does not see any benefit from Abuse of Science. That did not lead to establish the habit of reading in the learner (With back to the lessons of physics, chemistry, history and morality, I consider it funny if you do not enable us in class Wali read physics, chemistry, history and ethics.)
3 - and so we see Rousseau and Alan standing on opposite sides, when the first books and rejects the information collected on its way, sees the second reading is the medium of instruction than the Supreme.
If we want to take a position on the direction of former, taking into account the principles of modern education, and the role played by reading and reading in the modern era, we find that we should not drift with both previous extreme positions, but should take place and compromise between them. Can not dispense with the book, and that because of its importance in our lives, and can not be relied upon College and as a goal, but is only a means among other means approved in the educational process. It should be noted that it is wrong to look at the book that its purpose is to provide to children - in condensed form - curriculum materials that must be Memorized, it is not the book just a repository of information, but also is also a tool offers some ideas and meanings important benefit children in the style of thinking and train them on the good conscious thinking and suggests them practice what they have learned useful rational application.
Conclusion: Finally, we can not Ngelb opinion thinker a second opinion, but is required to take the views of all thinker is close to the right, and serves multiple aspects of the child's personality, as indispensable to us for education sensory and learning through experience, as we will dispense with the book, which is an important means to an end now to transfer the human heritage. although the disease is not due in fact to the book, by virtue of being a book, and not all education is based on the books Bad inevitably, Valda real falls back to the way bad writing books, and to process Use books and to separate this means for other ways to help in the formation of the child. In order to achieve the bitter worm envisaged positive reading should take care of selecting useful books, and make their content suitable for the desired goals of education, and make their appearance and style display Mcyran to Preference children and desires, and its approval for their mental abilities.
التسميات
Teaching Aids