Central planning and socialist theory.. Reliance on supply and demand indicators emerging market submerge competition

The central planning is the second column in the Cathedral of the theory of socialism. Rather than let the chaos sweeping the market, and ruin the economy, comes smart planning, from top to bottom, to focus resources on key sectors, and increases in technological growth.
In any case, this was about planning knowledge. Since the twenties of the twentieth century Austrian economist, Luolwig von mises . Describes the weak point in this planning. "Being the Achilles heel ,Socialist.
See how much should the factory in Irkutsk IRWKOUTSK That produces shoes? And any kind of metrics legs? 
How many screw Silolb to the left, and any kind of paper? What kind of put ratios between Muharraq carlIuRa-teur And imagination, how many rubles, or Zlouti Owen must be employed in each of the ten thousands of productive sectors?.
The generations of planners Socialists Sulaimi conscience, they Eetmzkon before such difficulty.They were always, require more data, and they get more lies. They reinforce bureaucracy. Since they are not able to rely on indicators of supply and demand arising from market submerge competition. They tried to measure the economy means hours, or in view of things depending on what is in it, more than were represented Bmustlkhat value. Then they tried, later may be Iqisuh model analysis Alaeconomitri (Logs, Alkhrojat)
Nothing was organized or not. The more they media, the economy becomes more complex and messy. After that before the Russian Revolution 65 years, was the Russian Federation logo long-standing in front of the stores, not the hammer and sickle.
Today, in the whole socialist world, or the former socialist, people flock, in order to enter the market economy - either wholly Kpulonaa; somewhat sheepishly or planned within the system, as is the case in the Soviet Union.
And then we find innovators socialists gather to recognize that the issue of leaving supply and demand, price controls - in some areas at least - give them unless central planning their Aamenh, - any relations to indicate what it takes the economy and what is needed.
However, economists, when debating understand these signs signaux , Neglecting to look at the fundamental change required by this principle, and the massive transfer of power, that arise from it. And this was the fundamental difference between a centrally planned economy, and the economy assisted the market, but based on the fact that the media goes vertically, in a centralized economy, while many of the media, the economy second (free) goes either horizontally or diagonally, within the system, Buyers and sellers share information at all levels, and in all directions.
This change does not threaten, among other senior staff in the field of planning, or the leaders themselves, but threatens millions of young bureaucrats, the source of their power to control the media made ​​along the way official.
The new methods in creating wealth, requires a lot a lot of knowledge, and a lot of media, and means of communication, which can not be given to the planned economies. Thus, the higher starting the economy is, you may rip the second rule of orthodox socialism ...

إرسال تعليق

أحدث أقدم

نموذج الاتصال