Medical science emerging work.. do unethical doctor to provide treatment unscientific or dangerous and to help the patient and convince its usefulness

Medical science emerging is what sprout about scientific research medical day of detection or a theory or a new treatment and the like, and these are hard-tuned, must be for the doctor to take into account two things in this science until it comes out of custody where, these two commands are to be issued this science for scientific point of saying, the people to witness her experience propriety of the application and practice. If these two met Alusvan necessary doctor ordered a third of his part is not a qualification for the application of this emerging science, as if the new surgical Tqna not hasten to be applied without supervision or attend a training course to qualify him to do, and all of this decision when the people of Medicine. If these things are taken into account the doctor, and the work was exercised when considering the people of art and it is eligible and has committed himself to assets used in it came out of custody. 
We have provided lists of medical ethics of the Association of American Medical reads as follows: "The work unethical a doctor providing the treatment of non-scientific or serious and assistance to do so and to convince the patient of its usefulness with the consequent delay therapeutic intervention what counts," [1], also confirms these regulations the avoidance of medical practices is feasible and commitment to medical practices scientific considered [2], the work of these practices is scientific is out about the origins of the profession, and this is what we have mentioned has decided scholars in terms of medical practice, said Imam Ibn Qudamah God's mercy: "do not guarantee the cupper not circumcision nor Mttabb if he knew them blunt workmanship did not avoid their hands, "this is stated by God's mercy that includes the scientific aspect of the theoretical (and expressed cleverly workmanship) and the practical side of the practical (and through him, saying not reaped their hands), turned out to us that the bottom line is the evidence of a positive responsibility here comes one of two things, or both: 
1 - violation of the original scientific what counts 
2 - violation of the practical application of what counts 
The officer, these two things in our contemporary reality of so-called (standard medical practice) and called Balojunbah "Standard of care", and he knows some as "the procedure of diagnostic or therapeutic physician must be followed in the case of a patient or a disease or condition clinically specific," It is a legal is: "the level of the middle of practice, which is usually followed by a doctor in a particular community," and this definition goes back to what we have decided formerly of Arbitration "your custom." As recently emerged the concept of "medicine Missned evidence" and called Balojunbah "evidence based medicine", which is based on documented research conducted at multiple centers in accordance with the approach increases the credibility of the clinical trials. 
But if he adheres to the doctor's assets profession scientific and practical As a result, treatment of transmission damage what it endures, because the result of unauthorized religiously and did not exceed, as stipulated by the son Qudamah and other scholars, Ibn al-Jawziyyah base exquisite in this section where he said: "transmission Felony guaranteed agreement, and the agreement of the transmission to be wasted. "

إرسال تعليق

أحدث أقدم

نموذج الاتصال